Connect 2 output ports of xpresso [CLOSED]

On 04/07/2015 at 10:45, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Again me
Sample code, execute at any c4d object, problem that ports do not connect (24 pos./line) :

import c4d  
  
def main() :  
  global vecoutp  
  obj = doc.GetActiveObject()  
  tag = doc.GetActiveTag()  
  if not tag:  
      tag = c4d.BaseTag(c4d.Texpresso)  
      obj.InsertTag(tag)  
        
  nm = tag.GetNodeMaster()  
  xg = nm.GetRoot()  
  print "pass 1"  
  for i in xrange(xg.GetOutPortCount()) :  
      port = xg.GetOutPort(i)  
      print port, port.GetName(xg), port.GetMainID()  
        
  bbox = nm.CreateNode(nm.GetRoot(),c4d.ID_OPERATOR_BOX,None, 0, 0)  
  nm.InsertFirst(xg, bbox)  
    
  if not xg.GetOutPort(0) :  
      vecoutp = xg.AddPort(c4d.GV_PORT_OUTPUT, 536870935)         
        
  c = vecoutp.Connect(bbox.GetOutPort(0)) # <<<<< not connect  
  print vecoutp, vecoutp.GetName(xg), vecoutp.GetMainID()  
  print bbox.GetOutPort(0), bbox.GetOutPort(0).GetName(bbox), bbox.GetOutPort(0).GetMainID()  
  print c  
    
  print "pass 2"  
    
  for i in xrange(xg.GetOutPortCount()) :  
        
      port = xg.GetOutPort(i)  
      print port, port.GetName(xg), port.GetMainID()  
        
  xg.Redraw()  
  nm.Message(c4d.MSG_UPDATE)      
  c4d.EventAdd()  
    
  
if __name__=='__main__':  
  main()

On 05/07/2015 at 23:31, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Has python for c4d such limit now? Or possible to do another way?!

On 06/07/2015 at 05:09, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Nodes are laying in same nodemaster

`

GvPort.Connect`( _port_ )
 **Note Remember, the nodes of the ports have to be in the same` GvNodeMaster`, otherwise the connection fails.**

Also i trying to make clone of tag/Nodemaster and do versa - fails

On 06/07/2015 at 07:20, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Hi Ilya,

I'm afraid, this currently a limitation in Python. As you need to connect two out-ports inside the Xgroup, this does currently not work (same for the input side as well).
I'm currently checking with development, if there are workarounds.

On 06/07/2015 at 07:29, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Hello Andreas
Thank you! I will wait.
I also will test such code with c++ port. Maybe need to port code to CAPI if will be success

On 06/07/2015 at 11:26, xxxxxxxx wrote:

I test this CAPI snippet(write and execute at Remo c4d++ platform)

There is interesting, it marks ports(arrows) but not show connections

  
{  
  BaseDocument *doc = GetActiveDocument();  
  
  BaseObject *obj = (BaseObject * ) doc->GetActiveObject();  
  if(!obj) return FALSE;  
  
  XPressoTag *xTag = (XPressoTag* )obj->GetTag(Texpresso, 0);  
  if(!xTag) return FALSE;  
  
  GvNodeMaster *nm = xTag->GetNodeMaster();   
  
  GvNode *n1 = nm->GetRoot();   
  GvPort *p1 = n1->AddPort(GV_PORT_OUTPUT, 536870935, GV_PORT_FLAG_IS_VISIBLE, TRUE);  
  
  GvNode *n2 = nm->CreateNode(nm->GetRoot(), ID_OPERATOR_BOX, NULL, 0, 0);  
  GvPort *p2 = n2->GetOutPort(0);  
  
      if (p1 && p2)  
      {  
      GvNode *n1u = NULL;  
      GvNode *n2u = NULL;  
      GvPort *p1u = NULL;  
      GvPort *p2u = NULL;  
      if (nm->IsConnectionValid(n1, p1, n2, p2, n1u, p1u, n2u, p2u))  
      {  
        n2->AddConnection(n1, p1, n2, p2);  
      }  
      }  
  
  nm->Message(MSG_UPDATE);  
  
  EventAdd();  
}  

http://oi61.tinypic.com/xmvhbk.jpg

On 07/07/2015 at 02:03, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Ok, found one method, i will make connected samples and store at HD or c4d content.

On 08/07/2015 at 01:01, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Hi
A few things are not as expected, so i remove flag solved at topic.

Andreas, any info about to break limit?

On 08/07/2015 at 01:34, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Hi Ilya,

actually I didn't mark this thread as solved, as I had no answer from the devs. Today it was acknowledged as a limitation. It is currently not possible to connect an output of a node to an output of the parent Xgroup in Python (same for input nodes). Unfortunately there seems to be no workaround. Sorry.

Regarding your C++ code and the missing connection. I think, you need to call AddConnection() for the other node involved. See this thread.

On 08/07/2015 at 02:01, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Originally posted by xxxxxxxx

Hi Ilya,

actually I didn't mark this thread as solved, as I had no answer from the devs. Today it was acknowledged as a limitation. It is currently not possible to connect an output of a node to an output of the parent Xgroup in Python (same for input nodes). Unfortunately there seems to be no workaround. Sorry.

Regarding your C++ code and the missing connection. I think, you need to call AddConnection() for the other node involved. See this thread.

I add tag to name of topic, thinking it was resolved.

I don't understand one thing in py-sdk, why need such checking - GvNode.IsGroupNode

About c++ snippet, i tried different ways and same result.

Also if it will be (x)group why need this https://developers.maxon.net/docs/Cinema4DCPPSDK/html/group___g_v___g_r_o_u_p.html

On 08/07/2015 at 13:05, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Andreas, you are right!!!
I did it by c++, i don't know what was wrong. After restarting of machine - it worked! (caches or anything else prevent it)

i change

n2->AddConnection(n1, p1, n2, p2);

to

n1->AddConnection(n1, p1, n2, p2);

i move to c++(maybe S.Rath will bring light to py-code). Solved. Thank you

On 09/07/2015 at 05:17, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Hi Ilya,

glad it worked in C++.
The developer feedback I talked about yesterday came from S. Rath. I'm afraid you will have to wait for a fix in C4D for this to work in Python.

On 09/07/2015 at 05:35, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Thanks a'lot.

The developer feedback I talked about yesterday came from S. Rath. I'm afraid you will have to wait for a fix in C4D for this to work in Python.

R17? or will be sp4 for r16?

Anyway, please, close topic. I will port stuff to c++

On 28/07/2015 at 07:25, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Sorry that remind
Have you fixed this issue in 16.051 patch?

upd.
seems not
it cover several mysterious issue of nvdia

On 28/07/2015 at 07:48, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Hi Ilya,

you seem to have found out yourself. I would have left a note here, if the SP fixed this bug. Internally this bug has been addressed, but it was to late to get into the 16.051 update.

On 28/07/2015 at 07:58, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Anyway thanks.
I see that developers back to work from vacation* . If we got fix.

* - You or someone from team pointed at this fact

On 03/11/2015 at 07:48, xxxxxxxx wrote:

This problem should be fixed in R17.

On 03/11/2015 at 08:14, xxxxxxxx wrote:

Originally posted by xxxxxxxx

This problem should be fixed in R17.

Hello
I forgot about this - i'm checking out of it > that's great - it works! Thanks a'lot
(please, do not brake it)