correct init of InExcludeData



  • On 19/11/2013 at 03:39, xxxxxxxx wrote:

    i stock here on a basic thing

    what is the correct term to init a InExcludeData ?

    def Init(self, op) :
        	bc = op.GetDataInstance()
        	bc.SetInt32(c4d.CLASSES_INEX_ACTIVE, 0)
        	return True
    

    Thanks



  • On 19/11/2013 at 06:35, xxxxxxxx wrote:

    Your question is a bit misleading (at least for me). You are asking how to initialize a 
    InExcludeData (instance), where the answer would be :

    InExcludeData.\__init\_\_([v])[](file:///E:/Misc/SDK%20Help/C4d%20SDK%20Documentation%20Python/help/modules/c4d/CustomDataType/InExcludeData/index.html#InExcludeData.__init__)
    _<_t_<__<_t_<__<_t_<__<_t_<__<_t_>_Parameters:| v  ([InExcludeData](file:///E:/Misc/SDK%20Help/C4d%20SDK%20Documentation%20Python/help/modules/c4d/CustomDataType/InExcludeData/index.html#c4d.InExcludeData)) – Copy constructor.
    ---|---
    Return type:| [InExcludeData](file:///E:/Misc/SDK%20Help/C4d%20SDK%20Documentation%20Python/help/modules/c4d/CustomDataType/InExcludeData/index.html#c4d.InExcludeData)
    Returns:| Notable is here IMHO that while v is optional, you are well advised to always pass  
    existing data from the gui-element you are working on/for as a parameter, or strange 
    things might happen.

    Your posted code on the other hand suggests that you are looking for the correct way 
    to initialize a InExclude property / field for a NodeData instance. It is not mandatory to 
    use NodeData.InitAttr(), but especially for more complex data types it actually is in the
    end. There are some problems with InitAttr() (for example with the the FontData type,
    which is initialized as TimeDateData), but I have never had problems with InExcludeData.
    The code would be something like that :

    self.Initattr(op, c4d.InExcludeData, c4d.SOMEID)
    

    I am not sure why you are using that backwards way with the data instance. Is that 
    because of the newly introduced types with R15 ? I have not dealt with them yet, so 
    I cannot say anything about them, but I also do not see why these are a of 
    importance here, as they actually target numeric types.



  • On 19/11/2013 at 06:57, xxxxxxxx wrote:

    thanks !


Log in to reply