Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you have been placed in read-only mode.
Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 11/10/2010 at 05:26, xxxxxxxx wrote:
User Information: Cinema 4D Version: 11.5 Platform: Mac OSX ; Language(s) :
--------- Hi,
what was the official build version of 11.532? My info splash screen says RC27670 but one of my customers has it saying Build F122852. Is there any difference? Why is it different from mine? I am on PC win7 and he is on OSX. Is that the difference? Can this introduce any problems?
Thank you
On 11/10/2010 at 05:57, xxxxxxxx wrote:
The official build number is RC27670. F122852 is not a valid build number.
cheers, Matthias
On 11/10/2010 at 06:00, xxxxxxxx wrote:
thanks matthias. I´ll tell my customer to get in contact with MAXON concerning this. Seems odd.
On 11/10/2010 at 06:38, xxxxxxxx wrote:
Originally posted by xxxxxxxx <ADDRESS> User Information: Cinema 4D Version: 11.5 Platform: Mac OSX ; Language(s) : --------- </ADDRESS> Hi,what was the official build version of 11.532? My info splash screen says RC27670 but one of my customers has it saying Build F122852. Is there any difference? Why is it different from mine? I am on PC win7 and he is on OSX. Is that the difference? Can this introduce any problems?Thank you
Originally posted by xxxxxxxx
<ADDRESS> User Information: Cinema 4D Version: 11.5 Platform: Mac OSX ; Language(s) :
--------- </ADDRESS> Hi,what was the official build version of 11.532? My info splash screen says RC27670 but one of my customers has it saying Build F122852. Is there any difference? Why is it different from mine? I am on PC win7 and he is on OSX. Is that the difference? Can this introduce any problems?Thank you
Maybe he's talking about FI22852 - and that was r11.528, not r11.532.
Best regards,
Wilfried
On 11/10/2010 at 07:46, xxxxxxxx wrote:
Ah! yes, that seems to be it. Thanks Wilfried