THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 05/06/2010 at 12:21, xxxxxxxx wrote:
ha, you are just too fast for my replies. however, i wouldnt care for that.. you have your base form and apply just some values to each point, so the form still stays similar to your original mesh. maybe you dont use a cube as a base, but a sphere with low polycount? maybe you apply some scale vector additionally so the object doesnt look so round anymore
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 05/06/2010 at 12:22, xxxxxxxx wrote:
well smaller numbers definitely help but still don't quite give me what I'm looking for. I think I might need to compare the current point position with the last point position.. Maybe.,. LOL
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 05/06/2010 at 12:23, xxxxxxxx wrote:
lol... sorry I replied before you had a chance to again. HAHA
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 05/06/2010 at 12:30, xxxxxxxx wrote:
if you use Mix with keeping more to your original point, say values between 0.5 and 1 for t, you should be able to get exactly that (in theory of course, since i'm not actually trying atm)
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 05/06/2010 at 12:37, xxxxxxxx wrote:
LOL.. yep you're right... it worked/./ just had to do a little tweaking with the numbers.. Thanks a lot for your help ello. I really appreciate you taking the time to help me.
~Shawn
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 05/06/2010 at 12:39, xxxxxxxx wrote:
glad i am able sometimes :)
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 05/06/2010 at 12:45, xxxxxxxx wrote:
Hey while you're here do you know if it is safe to subdivide an object from within the GetVirtualObjects() method?
~Shawn
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 05/06/2010 at 12:53, xxxxxxxx wrote:
i place my object inside a hypernurbs (Osds) to do so, but i think you mean something other. it should be able by using CommandData
here is a snippet of how i used the optimize command on a polygon object.
if (op->GetType()==Opolygon)
{
ModelingCommandData cd;
cd.doc = doc;
cd.op = op;
BaseContainer bc;
bc.SetReal(MDATA_OPTIMIZE_TOLERANCE, tolerance);
bc.SetReal(MDATA_OPTIMIZE_POINTS, TRUE);
bc.SetReal(MDATA_OPTIMIZE_POLYGONS, TRUE);
bc.SetReal(MDATA_OPTIMIZE_UNUSEDPOINTS, TRUE);
cd.bc = &bc;
if(SendModelingCommand(MCOMMAND_OPTIMIZE, cd))
{
cd.op->Message(MSG_UPDATE, NULL);
BaseTag *phongTag = op->MakeTag(Tphong);
BaseContainer *bc = phongTag->GetDataInstance();
bc->SetBool(PHONGTAG_PHONG_ANGLELIMIT,TRUE);
bc->SetReal(PHONGTAG_PHONG_ANGLE,ToRad(winkel));
} else {
GePrint("failed");
}
}
hope this makes sense :)
edit: in your case it'd be the MCOMMAND_SUBDIVIDE .. check the sdk for its parameters...
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 05/06/2010 at 12:59, xxxxxxxx wrote:
I was doing something simliar with
but for some reason it keeps crashiung on me when I try to do it.
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 05/06/2010 at 13:01, xxxxxxxx wrote:
hm.. did you set the parameters? i guess its some trial and error now, since i dont know why it crashes.
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 05/06/2010 at 13:03, xxxxxxxx wrote:
this is how I am attempting to subdivide
but it keeps crashing
if (mdat.bc->GetBool(HYPERNURBS_SUBDIVISION, TRUE)) //If HyperNURBS is checked
{
mdat.bc->SetBool(MDATA_SUBDIVIDE_HYPER, TRUE);
}
else
{
mdat.bc->SetBool(MDATA_SUBDIVIDE_HYPER, FALSE);
}
mdat.bc->SetLong(MDATA_SUBDIVIDE_SUB, subAmount);
mdat.bc->SetReal(MDATA_SUBDIVIDE_ANGLE, mdat.bc->GetReal(MAX_ANGLE));
//Subdivision Command
SendModelingCommand(MCOMMAND_SUBDIVIDE, mdat);
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 05/06/2010 at 13:04, xxxxxxxx wrote:
MAX_ANGLE is equal to pi and subAMount is a real that the user can adjust. :)
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 05/06/2010 at 13:11, xxxxxxxx wrote:
try catching the crash with
if(SendModelingCommand(MCOMMAND_SUBDIVIDE, mdat))
{
GePrint("done");
}
else
{
GePrint("failed");
}
just to be on the safe side..
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 05/06/2010 at 13:44, xxxxxxxx wrote:
Here's my subdivision code now...
Still crashing.
//SUBDIVISION
Real subAmount;
subAmount = mcd2.bc->GetLong(SPACEROCK_SUBDIVISIONS);
mcd2.mode = MODIFY_ALL;
mcd2.doc = hh->GetDocument();
if(SendModelingCommand(MCOMMAND_SUBDIVIDE, mcd2))
{
GePrint("done");
mcd2.bc->SetBool(MDATA_SUBDIVIDE_HYPER, TRUE);
mcd2.bc->SetLong(MDATA_SUBDIVIDE_SUB, subAmount);
mcd2.bc->SetReal(MDATA_SUBDIVIDE_ANGLE, pi);
//Subdivision Command
SendModelingCommand(MCOMMAND_SUBDIVIDE, mcd2);
}
else
{
GePrint("failed");
}
Any thoughts?
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 05/06/2010 at 13:55, xxxxxxxx wrote:
hey, dont call SendModelingCommand twice.. its already called in the if condition!
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 05/06/2010 at 14:06, xxxxxxxx wrote:
well.. that was a good thought and a good catch but unfortunately it's still crashing .. this one is a bit of a thorn today. LOL
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 05/06/2010 at 14:14, xxxxxxxx wrote:
another thing could be worth a try, to set the Parameters for an extra BaseContainer like i did it in my example:
BaseContainer bc;
bc.SetReal(MDATA_OPTIMIZE_TOLERANCE, tolerance);
bc.SetReal(MDATA_OPTIMIZE_POINTS, TRUE);
bc.SetReal(MDATA_OPTIMIZE_POLYGONS, TRUE);
bc.SetReal(MDATA_OPTIMIZE_UNUSEDPOINTS, TRUE);
cd.bc = &bc;
and in the if (SendModelingCommand... call "cd.op->Message(MSG_UPDATE, NULL);"
Oh, wait, i didnt see you setting mcd2.op to your object, maybe thats the main problem
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 05/06/2010 at 14:21, xxxxxxxx wrote:
yeah I added that in after I sent the message.. that didn't work.. I'
ll try your other suggestion though. Thanks,
~Shawn
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 05/06/2010 at 14:31, xxxxxxxx wrote:
alternatively, did you try CallCommand(14047); ?? maybe that works... but i dont know how you set the parameters in this case..
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 05/06/2010 at 15:15, xxxxxxxx wrote:
Awesome.. It works. Used your different basecontainer suggestion.
//SUBDIVISION
Real subAmount = bc->GetReal(SPACEROCK_SUBDIVISIONS);
BaseContainer bc2;
bc2.SetBool(MDATA_SUBDIVIDE_HYPER, TRUE);
bc2.SetLong(MDATA_SUBDIVIDE_SUB, subAmount);
bc2.SetReal(MDATA_SUBDIVIDE_ANGLE, pi);
mcd2.bc = &bc2;
mcd2.op = polyCube;
mcd2.mode = MODIFY_ALL;
mcd2.doc = hh->GetDocument();
if(SendModelingCommand(MCOMMAND_SUBDIVIDE, mcd2))
{
GePrint("done");
}
else
{
GePrint("failed");
}
Thanks again. I'm calling it a night. Thanks for your help.