THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 04/11/2009 at 15:03, xxxxxxxx wrote:
I got that request just a couple of days ago and the person
"fully understood" I could not deliver.
Cheers
Lennart
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 05/11/2009 at 00:57, xxxxxxxx wrote:
It's most likely a pirated version. To the best of my knowledge there was only one legal customer with this number.
cheers,
Matthias
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 08/11/2009 at 08:28, xxxxxxxx wrote:
Howdy,
I received that same number twice (one from France and the other from Norway), in the guise of an upgrade from 11 to 11.5 (which normally shouldn't require a new 11.0 number).
Adios,
Cactus Dan
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 08/11/2009 at 10:27, xxxxxxxx wrote:
I had one of those 'I need a new R11 number now that I've upgraded to R11.5' as well. My response was that the user's current R11 serial number for my plugin would work with R11.5, automatically even, and that was the end of it.
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 10/11/2009 at 03:50, xxxxxxxx wrote:
Originally posted by xxxxxxxx
I had one of those 'I need a new R11 number now that I've upgraded to R11.5' as well. My response was that the user's current R11 serial number for my plugin would work with R11.5, automatically even, and that was the end of it.
I also have these cases since 11.5! I also received a new R11 serial number myself from MAXON, so I was actually alright with providing new 11.5 serials. Any word on this by MAXON?
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 10/11/2009 at 03:59, xxxxxxxx wrote:
The only customer, that has requested a new license key due to an upgrade to R11.5 was this guy with the pirate number. So, for me it looks like a keygen, that has to be run again in order to get a 11.5 number what unfortunately also changed the core number, or it's a new keygen for 11.5.
I've just searched my database for these digits and I found a third one. So there is one from France, one from Sweden and one from the US.
I'm not sure at the moment what to do. These people are customers anyway, that have payed for the plugin...
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 27/11/2009 at 06:40, xxxxxxxx wrote:
i got two of these also, one from france and one from russia..
I see it like this: its obviously a pirate key, and if i give him a valid plugin serial for that key, what would prevent him from posting that plugin serial on the net, for all pirates to use ?
havent quite decided what to do, but i'll probably just refund the money..
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 27/11/2009 at 09:25, xxxxxxxx wrote:
Actually giving out a serial for a pirated version means that the key we shell out works on all the pirated copies as well... so in my opinion we should all be very clear that we don't send out keys to pirated versions.
Kabe
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 28/11/2009 at 15:46, xxxxxxxx wrote:
Exactly. I've also had some requests from people with that number.
"12345" really doesn't seem very serious.
Maybe we should start including the User name from the C4D license info into our serial algorithms, too. That way, we could still charge those guys and prevent the plugins from running at the other pirates' machines (except if they all decided to use the very same username, which is rather unlikely, I think).
Cheers,
Jack
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 29/11/2009 at 03:26, xxxxxxxx wrote:
Originally posted by xxxxxxxx
(except if they all decided to use the very same username, which is rather unlikely, I think).
Rethink, it is rather likely unfortunately.
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 30/11/2009 at 05:19, xxxxxxxx wrote:
Damn it 
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 30/11/2009 at 08:09, xxxxxxxx wrote:
yeah but fortunately, some rather like that 
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 09/01/2010 at 09:05, xxxxxxxx wrote:
It's still popping up.......
Cheers
Lennart
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 09/01/2010 at 11:04, xxxxxxxx wrote:
Originally posted by xxxxxxxx
yeah but fortunately, some rather like that
so you like warez people fooling you with the same name? 
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 10/01/2010 at 09:14, xxxxxxxx wrote:
Originally posted by xxxxxxxx
..
so you like warez people fooling you with the same name?
actually what was meant is the opposite.
guess im not too good at making jokes by juggling words around..
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 24/01/2010 at 16:22, xxxxxxxx wrote:
Since I again got license requests with the very same "12345" serial number, what shall we do? Of course, giving out a license on that serial would be stupid. But on the other hand, that guy has already paid me for the license.
What would you do? Send the money back? I'm really no big fan of that 
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 24/01/2010 at 16:54, xxxxxxxx wrote:
Atm, I do refunds on the spot telling them straight
that this number is floating around the web and can not be accepted.
I add that if this is a mistake, from my side, they are welcome
to sort it out per mail. Never happened yet………
Usually (with other numbers) I simply answer that they are welcome
to send a valid number and the license is on "hold" since I state
that there is no refund at my shop. Also works, it's just sad to have to
do those mails.
Cheers
Lennart
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 25/01/2010 at 06:04, xxxxxxxx wrote:
Sounds reasonable. Did the same now
Thanks Lennart!
Cheers,
Jack
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 25/01/2010 at 09:16, xxxxxxxx wrote:
thats how i do it as well and nobody has ever complained yet
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 03/02/2010 at 08:15, xxxxxxxx wrote:
ok, that's a solution for the "12345" digits. But how can we detect other illegal digits? If we are intended by MAXON to deny plugin licenses for illegal C4D numbers, we need a database to validate the number.
A few moments ago, another customer has asked for a new plugin license, because his c4d base number has changed when upgrading to R11.5.So there is still the question, whether that is possible in a legal way.
@Maxon: How can it happen, that a customer gets a new base number when upgrading to X.5 (excluding the multi-license reason)?