SplineMask



  • THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

    On 02/06/2006 at 07:11, xxxxxxxx wrote:

    User Information:
    Cinema 4D Version:   9.6 
    Platform:   Windows  ; Mac  ;  Mac OSX  ; 
    Language(s) :     C++  ;

    ---------
    Hi All,

    i'm testing in these days Mograph (great module :) and i'll like to know how is working the SplineMask plugin.
    It's a GetVirtualObject? GetContour?
    Will be good to me to know what's is changed in the new sdk because my splinetools is not working anymore because my getvirtualobject is not executed by cinema when i generate splines.

    Thanks to devolopers
    Renato T.



  • THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

    On 02/06/2006 at 07:59, xxxxxxxx wrote:

    I think they use both (and I think both functions are necessary!). You need to set OBJECT_ISSPLINE and OBJECT_GENERATOR.

    But I agree, a simple working example in the sdk examples would have been sensible.

    Katachi



  • THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

    On 03/06/2006 at 07:26, xxxxxxxx wrote:

    OBJECT_GENERATOR|OBJECT_INPUT|OBJECT_SPLINE :(



  • THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

    On 03/06/2006 at 09:46, xxxxxxxx wrote:

    OBJECT_ IS SPLINE



  • THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

    On 03/06/2006 at 09:58, xxxxxxxx wrote:

    sorry, ISSPLINE.. before was under 8.5sdk.
    Anyway, it's not working

    Cheers
    Renato



  • THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

    On 03/06/2006 at 10:00, xxxxxxxx wrote:

    hmm, I don´t know then as I haven´t used it yet.



  • THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

    On 03/06/2006 at 10:02, xxxxxxxx wrote:

    thanks anyway
    Renato


Log in to reply