Currently Selected BaseList2D



  • THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

    On 28/08/2005 at 19:24, xxxxxxxx wrote:

    User Information:
    Cinema 4D Version:    
    Platform:   Windows  ; Mac  ;  Mac OSX  ; 
    Language(s) :     C++  ;

    ---------
    Is there any way of getting the list of currently selected BaseList2D objects within the timeline? I can see how to get postfx, om objects, tags and materials, but I can't find any mention of an accesible timeline baselist.

    Ideally i'm looking for something similar to the BaseDocument::GetActiveObjects routine but.



  • THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

    On 29/08/2005 at 05:12, xxxxxxxx wrote:

    Afai can see, the selected object in the TL is also the selected object in the OM and vice versa.



  • THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

    On 29/08/2005 at 12:43, xxxxxxxx wrote:

    the om only supports standard objects and tags, thus, it doesn't support shaders, materials, videopost, subcomponents of those, or any other non geometry/tag NodeData's. also selected in the timeline isn't always the same as selected in the om (it's a different bit within the object).



  • THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

    On 29/08/2005 at 13:43, xxxxxxxx wrote:

    Not that I know of anyway, you will need to just create your own function to go through the object type you are interested in and look at the BIT_AAMAN bit. AFAIK CINEMA has no cache for this bit anyway, so this would be no slower, afair it was only with R9 that the GetActiveObjects had a cache added to the document (to speed it up).



  • THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED

    On 30/08/2005 at 11:23, xxxxxxxx wrote:

    ah yes, you are right per. Haven´t thought of this at all (sometimes narrow minded :).


Log in to reply