Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you have been placed in read-only mode.
Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).
THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 27/05/2005 at 13:06, xxxxxxxx wrote:
User Information: Cinema 4D Version: R8.2 Platform: Windows ; Language(s) : C++ ;
--------- Hi all,
I would like to know if this usefull library have some imprecision problems because when the ray collide with a point.. return a null Rc.
thanks in advance Renato T.
On 28/05/2005 at 06:03, xxxxxxxx wrote:
are you sure you are using it correctly? Works perfectly here. Some code would be useful.
On 28/05/2005 at 10:46, xxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi Katachi,
the prob is that is working at perfect here too except when the ray intersect a point
On 01/06/2005 at 11:03, xxxxxxxx wrote:
So is this in the case of a standalone point in space, or in the case where a ray hits exactly on a point between polygons? The former might be problematic, but I would have expected the latter to work. If you give me a testcase that sets up an object and shows how the ray collider misses a point, I could send it along to the programmers.
On 01/06/2005 at 11:10, xxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi Mikael,
The problem occour when you hit a point of a poligon. just pass to GeRayCollider a single square polygon with a left low corner to 0,0,0 and upper right corner to 1,1,0 and try to shot a ray from 0,0,-1 and you'll get a null from Intersection function.
Cheers Renato T.
On 04/07/2005 at 05:37, xxxxxxxx wrote:
Any News?
On 23/07/2005 at 07:53, xxxxxxxx wrote:
News?
On 27/07/2005 at 06:58, xxxxxxxx wrote:
I'm afraid such precision is outside the scope of the ray collider class. Generally I wouldn't trust it to detect collisions with border cases, even if they look numerically simple. On the other hand, if you find a case where the ray can leak through an edge between two polygons that could be a bug. If you need numerical stability on borders you will probably need to use some kind of arbitrary precision CAD library.
On 27/07/2005 at 07:23, xxxxxxxx wrote:
ok Thanks Renato T.