THE POST BELOW IS MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD. RELATED SUPPORT INFORMATION MIGHT BE OUTDATED OR DEPRECATED
On 18/11/2004 at 17:07, xxxxxxxx wrote:
Cinema 4D Version: 8.100
Platform: Windows ;
Language(s) : C++ ;
what is the best method to check if two materials are the same (I need to write my own "RemoveDuplicateMaterials" function). Which Parameters are used for this?
On 19/11/2004 at 08:03, xxxxxxxx wrote:
I tried to browse through each container ID and check if they are the same on both materials, but that doesn´t work (either if I check the returned GeData with the compare operator == or if I really check the values of each GeData).
Anybody any idea?
On 01/12/2004 at 03:12, xxxxxxxx wrote:
How do you mean? Why doesn't checking all values work? How would you define "being the same material"?
On 01/12/2004 at 07:43, xxxxxxxx wrote:
I don´t know why it doesn´t work, but it doesn´t. It always tells me that it´s different. "Being the same material" is a material with the exact same settings (the name is irrelevant though, it can be different). Just the way Cineam does.
But from your words, I think I better recheck if I didn´t do anything wrong.
Thanks, will report if the problem still exists.
On 01/12/2004 at 14:10, xxxxxxxx wrote:
I think I've just encountered the same problem as you, but I think I have a solution.
I found (as you did), that if you just iterate through all the parameters and compare them, it always says they are different.
I eventually found out that if you have a 'null' GeData object, then it acts like a NaN, in that if compares false with everything including itself.
Why is this relevant? Because the parameters seem to include a whole bunch of these null/NaN values!
A workaround that I found that seems to work if you want to compare materials A and B is to iterate through all the parameters, and for each parameter get a GeData gA and a GeData gB.
Now, before checked if gA==gB, check whether gA==gA.
If it doesn't then ignore that parameter and move on to the next one.
This seems to work!
Hope this helps.
Cheers - Steve
On 01/12/2004 at 14:22, xxxxxxxx wrote:
thanks, I will try that!!